Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MAY 2013

Further Setback For The CFPB Director’s Authority?

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

A split panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision yesterday holding that a "recess" appointment to the National Labor Relations Board was unconstitutional and invalid.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

A split panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision yesterday holding that a "recess" appointment to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) was unconstitutional and invalid. NLRB v. New Vista Nursing and Rehabilitation, Nos. 11-3440, 12-1027, 12-1936 (3rd Cir. May 16, 2013). Like the District of Columbia Circuit Court's ruling in Noel Canning v. NLRB, 705 F.3d 490 (2013), the Third Circuit ruled that the president's authority to make "recess appointments" applies only to appointments made between sessions of Congress and does not apply to appointments made during congressional sessions. The ruling calls into question, yet again, the validity of the recess appointment of Richard Cordray to the CFPB.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from