Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 NOVEMBER 2026

Drafting Earnout Provisions That Actually Work

Earnouts are intended to bridge valuation gaps in M&A transactions but frequently become sources of post-closing litigation over accounting methodologies, operational control, and contractual interpretation. This analysis examines how careful drafting of earnout provisions—including precise financial metric definitions, balanced operational covenants, and appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms—can significantly reduce litigation risk...

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Highlights

  • Earnouts can help bridge valuation gaps between buyers and sellers but frequently lead to post-closing disputes over financial metrics, operational decision-making, financial reporting and contractual interpretation.
  • Careful drafting can reduce litigation risk by clearly defining financial and operational metrics, allocating buyer discretion and selecting dispute resolution mechanisms that correspond to the nature of potential disagreements.
  • Earnout structures can also have significant tax consequences, including whether payments are treated as additional purchase price or compensation, making coordination between transaction counsel and tax advisors important during the drafting process.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from