Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 SEPTEMBER 2026

Does Using AI Waive Attorney-Client Privilege?

Generative AI tools promise efficiency gains for legal departments, but they also create new risks around attorney-client privilege. When confidential communications enter public chatbots or improperly configured platforms, the third-party disclosure that results can waive privilege entirely. Understanding which tools preserve confidentiality, how to maintain attorney direction over AI-assisted work, and what competence now requires is essential for protecting privileged information in an AI-enabled practic

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

There’s nothing new about lawyers using tools to work faster. Legal research moved from bound volumes to Lexis and Westlaw, case files moved from cabinets to the cloud, and each shift arrived with someone predicting the end of careful practice. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is the latest step in that progression, and for the most part, it earns its place. It finds information quickly, drafts usable content, analyzes contracts, and speeds document review.

What makes this step different, though, is where the information actually goes. When a lawyer runs a search on Westlaw, nothing about the matter leaves the relationship. When a lawyer pastes a board memo into a public chatbot, something might. For a legal department, the question is not whether privilege exists. If you provide legal advice, it does. The question is whether a tool your team uses can quietly give it away, and whether you understand the tool well enough to know.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from