Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 SEPTEMBER 2014

Delaware Recognizes The Garner Doctrine

As difficult as it can be to properly identify the "client" inside a corporation, there is another possibility — that the corporation's shareholders may be the real "client."

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

As difficult as it can be to properly identify the "client" inside a corporation, within a corporate family, and when corporate lawyers deal with employees, there is another counterintuitive possibility — that the corporation's shareholders may be the real "client."

In Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1970), the Fifth Circuit recognized that in certain circumstances shareholders pursuing a derivative case could access communications between corporate executives and the corporation's lawyers. That doctrine eventually developed into what is called "the fiduciary exception," when combined with an old English trust principle recognizing trusts' beneficiaries as the real "clients" (and thus entitled to communications between the trustee and her lawyer). Since Garner, some courts have applied the same principle to shareholders' non-derivative claims against corporations, while other courts have questioned that expansion. In Wal‑Mart Stores, Inc. v.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from