Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 APRIL 2026

Delaware Clarifies Buyer Knowledge – Why Washington LLCs Take Note

Delaware's Court of Chancery has issued a landmark ruling in In re Dura Medic Holdings that clarifies two critical issues in private M&A transactions: whether buyers can pursue breach claims despite pre-closing knowledge of potential issues, and when transaction multiples can be used to calculate damages. These developments have significant implications for how purchase agreements are negotiated and drafted, particularly regarding sandbagging provisions and valuation-based damages models.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

When Delaware speaks, deal lawyers listen. And in In re Dura Medic Holdings, Inc., Consolidated Litigation, Cons. C.A. No. 2019-0474-JTL (Del. Ch. Feb. 20, 2025), the Delaware Court of Chancery clarified two issues that routinely shape private M&A negotiations:

(1) Whether Delaware remains a pro‑sandbagging jurisdiction, and
(2) When a buyer can use a transaction multiple to calculate damages for a breach of representations and warranties.

If you’re a Washington business owner, or an LLC member preparing for a sale, these developments may feel distant. But the logic behind them touches the same contract structures Washington companies rely on every day. And in a market where buyers are increasingly aggressive in post‑closing disputes, understanding how other jurisdictions treat these issues can help you draft stronger agreements here at home.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from