Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 SEPTEMBER 2021

Another Diversity Suit Stifled

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

Last week, yet another federal court dismissed a shareholder derivative suit that claimed a company had failed to diversify its corporate leadership team.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Last week, yet another federal court dismissed a shareholder derivative suit that claimed a company had failed to diversify its corporate leadership team. Shareholders had alleged that Opko Health Inc., a Miami-based medical company, failed to nominate or appoint minorities to the board and executive management team despite public statements celebrating the company's diverse staff.

Unlike other recent diversity-focused suits subject to similar fates, this case was not dismissed on the basis of a forum selection clause in the company's charter or corporate bylaws. Instead, the court held that the plaintiffs had failed to show that any director faced a substantial likelihood of liability on their claims. The court's thorough analysis of these claims evinces a strong sense that, absent specific allegations regarding directors' actions or knowledge regarding their company's purported diversity failures, these types of claims may continue to succumb to motions to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from