Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2015

A Tale Of Two Non-Competes: Why Drafting Matters

Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Fox Rothschild LLP

In a recent blog, we cautioned readers that an overprotective non-compete can result in no protection at all. In that case, Unlimited Opportunity, Inc. v. Waadah, a franchisor could not enforce a non-compete clause despite its franchisee's clear violation.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

In a recent blog, we cautioned readers that an overprotective non-compete can result in no protection at all. In that case, Unlimited Opportunity, Inc. v. Waadah, a franchisor could not enforce a non-compete clause despite its franchisee's clear violation. 861 N.W.2d 437 (Neb. 2015).

A recent case, JH Inc. v. Cline, paints a rosier picture for franchisors. No. 14-6931 (D.N.J. Oct. 29, 2015). Here too, the allegations stated a blatant violation of a non-compete. But while Waadah was a drafting cautionary tale, Cline shows why certain provisions should be on the drafting checklist. In this blog, we'll explain how certain franchise agreement provisions paved the way for a preliminary injunction prohibiting a former franchisee from competing.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from