Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 AUGUST 2021

This Week At The Ninth: Class Objections And Robocalls

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

This week, the Court addresses when a defendant can raise personal jurisdiction objections to non-resident members of a putative class, and explains the scope...

United StatesConsumer Protection

This week, the Court addresses when a defendant can raise personal jurisdiction objections to non-resident members of a putative class, and explains the scope of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's prohibition on robocalls to cell phones.

MOSER v. BENEFYTT

The Court holds that a defendant does not waive an objection under Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017) to a district court's certification of nationwide classes when it fails to include a personal jurisdiction challenge to the claims of non-resident putative class members in its motion to dismiss.

The Panel:  Judges Bybee, Bress, and Cardone (W.D. Tex.), with Judge Bress writing the opinion, and Judge Cardone dissenting.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from