Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 FEBRUARY 2011

Product Liability Update - January 2011

Massachusetts Federal District Court Holds Hospital Not Fraudulently Joined in Medical Device Suit, as Warranty Claim Asserting Hospital Was Product Seller Rather than Service Provider Has Reasonable Basis;

United StatesConsumer Protection

Massachusetts Federal District Court Holds Hospital Not Fraudulently Joined in Medical Device Suit, as Warranty Claim Asserting Hospital Was Product Seller Rather than Service Provider Has Reasonable Basis; No Federal Question Presented as Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Does Not Completely Preempt State Law so Claims Could Only Arise under Federal Law

Plaintiff in Phillips v. Medtronic, Inc., 2010 WL 4939997 (D. Mass. Dec. 1, 2010), developed inflammatory masses causing pain and loss of certain functions after hospital treatment that included the implantation of two intrathecal pain pumps. The United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") had issued pre-market approvals for the devices prior to plaintiff's treatment, but several years after that treatment the manufacturer partially recalled the pumps after discovering an increase in reports of inflammatory masses.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from