Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 FEBRUARY 2007

Has Dealing In Consumer Transactions Become Riskier In Ohio?

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

What happens when a $16,400 truck turns into a $470,000 verdict? You catch the eye of one governor, incur the ire of a second, and in the process create a constitutional law question worthy of any bar examination. Moreover, if you sell to consumers, the ability to assess your litigation risks virtually disappears.

United StatesConsumer Protection

What happens when a $16,400 truck turns into a $470,000 verdict? You catch the eye of one governor, incur the ire of a second, and in the process create a constitutional law question worthy of any bar examination. Moreover, if you sell to consumers, the ability to assess your litigation risks virtually disappears.

This is exactly the situation Ohio businesses now face because the extent to which a consumer may recover noneconomic damages under Ohio's Consumer Sales Practices Act ("CSPA") remains unresolved. The CSPA exists to provide consumers with legal recourse when they feel they are victims of unfair or deceptive consumer sales practices. In November of last year, the Ohio Supreme Court, in Whitaker v. M.T. Automotive, Inc., allowed noneconomic damages to be awarded so long as the consumer proved a CSPA violation. The end result was that a $16,400 truck purchased by Mr. Whitaker netted a $470,000 verdict, $315,000 of which related to noneconomic damages. But more on that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from