Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MAY 2017

Entering The FDCPA Safe Harbor Just Got More Difficult In The Second Circuit

The Second Circuit's recent opinion in Carlin v. Davidson Fink LLP, No. 15-3105-cv (2d Cir. Mar. 29, 2017), has important ramifications for the debt collection industry.

United StatesConsumer Protection

The Second Circuit's recent opinion in Carlin v. Davidson Fink LLP, No. 15-3105-cv (2d Cir. Mar. 29, 2017), has important ramifications for the debt collection industry.

Carlin, a putative class action, addressed the adequacy of a Fair Debt Collection Practice Act ("FDCPA") initial notice sent per Title 15, U.S.C., § 1692g, which requires a debt collector to send a written notice to a consumer as or within five days of its initial communication with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt, containing the amount of the debt, the name of the creditor to whom the debt is owed, and certain information about the consumer's rights.

In Carlin, the initial notice set forth a "Total Amount Due" as a dollar figure, but added that such amount "may include estimated fees, costs, additional payments and/or escrow disbursements . . . which are not yet due" and apprised the consumer that if he paid the total amount specified to be due by a certain date, he would

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from