Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 OCTOBER 2016

California Prop 65: More Unintended Consequences

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Last month, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ("OEHHA") adopted new Proposition 65 warning regulations.

United StatesConsumer Protection

Last month, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ("OEHHA") adopted new Proposition 65 warning regulations.  Much of the discussions regarding these new regulations have centered on the warning requirements that become effective, after an approximately two-year phase-in period, in August 2018.

There were, however, amendments to Prop 65 settlement terms, penalty amounts and attorney's fees in civil actions filed by private persons that became effective on October 1, 2016.  These amendments have "flown under the radar" but actually may be more problematic than the proposed new warnings.

Proposition 65 permits private citizens (known by the plaintiff's bar as "citizen enforcers") to initiate enforcement actions, and, when they do, they are entitled to 25% of any penalties assessed by the courts and attorney's fees.  An additional form of payment, called "payments in lieu of civil penalties" or "PILPS," are also permitted under the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from