Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JULY 2023

Compliance And Enforcement Takeaways From Two Supreme Court False Claims Act Decisions

Baker Botts L.L.P.
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Contributor
Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts is a leading international law firm with 11 offices located in the US, Europe, and the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker Botts L.L.P.

In June 2023, the Supreme Court issued two major decisions concerning the U.S. False Claims Act ("FCA").

United StatesCompliance

In June 2023, the Supreme Court issued two major decisions concerning the U.S. False Claims Act ("FCA"). These decisions, which clarify the FCA's scienter standard and certain procedures around the government intervening in FCA cases, have key implications for in-house counsel and compliance officers involved in litigating FCA actions and implementing FCA-related compliance programs. FCA compliance is a key issue for companies considering applying for, or taking part in, government grant and loan programs, given these programs often require applicants and participants to make both express and implied representations in connection with receiving federal funds.

I. Overview

While there are several different theories of liability under the FCA, at its core, the statute prohibits "knowingly" presenting a false claim for payment to the U.S. government, or "knowingly" causing such a claim to be made. See 31 U.S.C. § 3729. One unique procedural aspect of FCA actions is

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from