Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2024

The Implications Of The NCAA Antitrust Settlement

This past month, the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) agreed to a settlement framework with the plaintiffs in three class action antitrust lawsuits...

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

This past month, the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) agreed to a settlement framework with the plaintiffs in three class action antitrust lawsuits1 which will forever change the landscape of collegiate athletics. For as long as college athletics has been in existence, the participating student-athletes have been considered “amateurs,” meaning they could not be paid directly for their participation or performance in their respective sports. This concept of amateurism has been at the core of college athletics and is an ideal the NCAA has fiercely protected for decades through litigation and lobbying efforts. Over the past decade, amateurism's viability has been significantly threatened by previous unfavorable antitrust verdicts2 and widespread state name, image, and likeness (“NIL”) legislation. However, pending United States District Court Judge Claudia Wilken's final approval, this settlement appears to be the final and fatal blow to amateurism.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from