Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JANUARY 2020

Demystifying The Antitrust Implications Of Franchise No-Poach Agreements

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

In 2016, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) jointly issued "Antitrust Guidance to Human Resource Professionals," ...

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

In 2016, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) jointly issued “Antitrust Guidance to Human Resource Professionals,” addressing employee no-poach agreements – agreements between two or more employers that restrict employee recruiting or hiring.1 According to the agencies, these agreements may violate Section 1 of the Sherman Act by depressing wages and impeding employee mobility. No-poach agreements also fall within the purview of various state consumer protection statutes, such as California’s Cartwright Act and Washington’s Consumer Protection Act.

Recently, private litigants and state enforcers have targeted no-poach clauses in franchise agreements spanning the economic spectrum, including fast-food, fitness studio, hotel/motel, automotive service, and tax preparation chains. Typically, these franchise no-poach agreements restrict franchisees from hiring employees of the franchisor or other franchisees. Discussed in detail below, Sti

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from