Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2014

Civil Antitrust Attorneys Receive Wire-Tap Evidence

The Canada Supreme Court has ruled that civil antitrust plaintiffs may receive wire-tap evidence obtained in the criminal investigation into an alleged price-fixing scheme.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

The Canada Supreme Court ruled earlier this month that civil antitrust plaintiffs may receive wire-tap evidence obtained in the criminal investigation into an alleged price-fixing scheme by several large gas companies. During the criminal investigation, the Competition Bureau of Canada intercepted and recorded more than 220,000 private communications which it used to bring antitrust proceedings against 54 persons.

Now the Court has ordered production of the recordings for the civil plaintiffs, but with limitations in order to protect the privacy interests of the persons recorded. First, the recordings will be screened to protect the privacy of third parties not involved in the proceedings. Then, the recordings will only be disclosed to the lawyers and experts participating in the civil proceedings. Furthermore, the Court found the "duty of confidentiality" imposed on the parties, their counsel, and experts would protect the right to privacy of those recorded.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from