Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 DECEMBER 2009

Bundled Discounts After "Doe v. Abbot Labs"

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

For the past several years, US courts have been struggling to articulate the limitations imposed by Section 2 of the Sherman Act on dominant firms seeking to engage in "bundling."

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

Originally published 10 December 2009

Keywords: Section 2, Sherman Act, bundling, Doe, Abbot, bundled discounts

For the past several years, US courts have been struggling to articulate the limitations imposed by Section 2 of the Sherman Act on dominant firms seeking to engage in "bundling."  Bundling typically involves providing customers a discount when they purchase products spanning several different product lines.  The bundled discounts most frequently challenged under Section 2 are those where the bundle includes both "monopoly products," over which the dominant firm arguably wields monopoly power, and "competitive products," relative to which the dominant firm faces competition.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from