Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JANUARY 2024

Best Antitrust Practices For Exchanging Competitive Information Via Third Parties

There is no guaranteed safety zone for exchanging competitively sensitive information amongst competitors. Practices once deemed relatively safe—like subscribing to a third-party data services provider...

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

There is no guaranteed safety zone for exchanging competitively sensitive information amongst competitors. Practices once deemed relatively safe—like subscribing to a third-party data services provider to manage the exchange—now carry increased risks. This is mostly because machine learning and AI have made it possible to predict a specific competitor's future strategies even if a third party has aggregated and anonymized the underlying data and even if the underlying data is old.

While antitrust compliance is best assessed on a case-by-case basis, there are general guideposts that third parties and their subscribers should understand before gathering, providing, and/or exchanging price, production, procurement, employment or other competitively sensitive data that competitors would not (or should not) share directly with each other.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from