Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 NOVEMBER 2005

Authorized Generics: Antitrust Issues and the Hatch-Waxman Act

An authorized generic (AG) is a pharmaceutical product that was originally marketed and sold by a brand company, but is relabeled and marketed under a generic product name.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

By Mr Narinder Banait*

An authorized generic (AG) is a pharmaceutical product that was originally marketed and sold by a brand company, but is relabeled and marketed under a generic product name. One problem with AGs is that they do not have to abide by the 180-day market exclusivity provision granted by the Hatch-Waxman Act to the first generic on the market. AGs could thus undercut the public policy rationale underlying the Hatch-Waxman Act, and have the potential of threatening the generic industry as a whole.

An AG, also known as "authorized copy" or "brand-inbottle," may be marketed by the brand company itself or through a subsidiary, or the brand company may license the product to another company for marketing in return for royalties. The AG is sold at a lower cost, and as an alternative, to the branded product. The brand companies may choose to launch an authorized generic for a variety of reasons, including to settle patent litigation with a generic company by partnering

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from