Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2014

7th Circuit Seeks Solicitor General’s Input On The Scope Of The FTAIA

On March 27, 2014, the 7th Circuit affirmed a district court decision that Motorola’s price-fixing claims were barred under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act.

United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law

As reported in the April 2014 of Orrick's Antitrust and Competition Newsletter, on March 27, 2014, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court decision that Motorola's price-fixing claims based on purchases that its non-U.S. affiliates made from non-U.S. defendants were barred under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act (FTAIA). Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp. et al., 746 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 2014). The 7th Circuit issued its decision based solely on the petition for review and without full briefing on the merits or a hearing.

That denial, which surprised many, has since turned into an unusual series of orders from the 7th Circuit, which might be attributed to the complexity and difficulty of analyzing and applying the FTAIA in light of international comity concerns. On April 24, 2014, Motorola submitted a petition for rehearing en banc, which was supported by a joint brief filed by the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from