Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 DECEMBER 2019

Lucy Frew's Fintech Column: December 2019

Walkers
Walkers
Contributor
Walkers

Walkers

Firm Details Global Managing Partner: Ingrid Pierce Office Managing Partner: Daniel Wood Number of...

View firm profile
Explore more from Walkers

In this edition of her column, Lucy considers the legal statement on the status of cryptoassets and smart contracts published by the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce.

United KingdomTechnology

In this edition of her column, Lucy considers the legal statement on the status of cryptoassets and smart contracts published by the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce.

UK Jurisdiction Taskforce legal statement on status of cryptoassets and smart contracts

The key findings of the legal statement on the status of cryptoassets and smart contracts published by the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce ("UKJT") earlier this month are that cryptoassets are in principle to be treated as property and that smart contracts can be interpreted using ordinary established legal principles. The legal statement carries no legal weight but is likely to inform legal arguments and judgments.

The conclusion that a cryptoasset is capable of being property matters because proprietary rights are recognised against the whole world and are of particular importance in scenarios involving insolvency, loss, fraud and theft. Proprietary rights are also relevant to the questions of whether there can be a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from