Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 FEBRUARY 2022

No Input VAT Deduction For VAT Not In Fact Charged

n Zipvit Ltd v HMRC (Case C-156/20), the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") has held that, where a contract for services provides for VAT to be charged in addition...

United KingdomTax
Dawen Gao
Dawen Gao

In Zipvit Ltd v HMRC (Case C-156/20), the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") has held that, where a contract for services provides for VAT to be charged in addition, a taxable person cannot claim to deduct an amount of VAT for which it has not been charged and which it has therefore not passed on to the final consumer.

This decision puts to rest a long-running test case in relation to claims for input tax recovery brought by Zipvit and other businesses which received postal services from Royal Mail which ought to have been treated as taxable. As Advocate General ("AG") Kokott noted in her opinion, the total value of claims made against HMRC amounts to £500 million to £1 billion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from