Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 APRIL 2013

Life With The New Protocol: The Diminution Question

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

This case, therefore, acts as a useful reminder of the principles of determination of dilapidations claims and reinforces the commitment of the judiciary to focus heavily on both cost of repairs and valuation issues when assessing such claims.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

One of the key advents of the new dilapidations protocol was the formal acknowledgment for the first time of the steps that the parties to a dilapidations dispute must take to demonstrate the comparison between the cost of repairs and the diminution in value of the landlord's reversion.

As is made clear by paragraph 9.1 of the protocol:

"Prior to issuing proceedings, the landlord should quantify its loss by providing to the tenant a detailed breakdown of the issues and consequential losses based on either a formal diminution valuation or an account of the actual expenditure or, where it has carried out some but not all remedial action, a combination of both; unless, in all the circumstances, it would be unreasonable to do so".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from