Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 DECEMBER 2024

Data Protection And Training AI Models: Deployers Must Assess Whether The Models They Use Were Developed Lawfully

The EDPB's Opinion clarifies GDPR implications for AI models, emphasizing the case-by-case assessment of anonymization, legitimate interests, and the impact of unlawfully processed personal data, urging robust AI governance and compliance.

United KingdomPrivacy

The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) was asked by the Irish supervisory authority to issue an Opinion under Article 64(2) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on AI models and processing personal data (the Opinion). The Opinion sets out the EDPB's answers to the four questions the Irish supervisory authority put to it.

1. When and how AI models can be considered 'anonymous'

The EDPB considers that AI models trained with personal data cannot, in all cases, be considered anonymous. Anonymity must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. For an AI model to be considered anonymous, both (1) the likelihood of direct (including probabilistic) extraction of personal data regarding individuals whose personal data were used to develop the model and (2) the likelihood of obtaining, intentionally or not, such personal data from queries, should be insignificant, taking into account 'all the means reasonably likely to be used' by the controller or another person. It

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from