Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 AUGUST 2012

The Twitter Judgment: The Law With Unintended Consequences?

Much has been made of the High Court’s decision in "Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions" [2012] EWHC 2157 that a message posted on Twitter in jest was not to be considered menacing.

United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Chris Watson
Chris Watson
Joanne Wheeler
Joanne Wheeler
Bailey Ingram
Bailey Ingram

Much has been made of the High Court's decision in Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions [2012] EWHC 2157 that a message posted on Twitter in jest was not to be considered menacing and so a criminal offence under the Communications Act 2003.  Worthy of further attention, however, is the Court's finding that the message was sent over a "public electronic communications network" and the huge extent of its potential application.

1. "The Internet" is a public network

The Court made the ground-breaking finding that the internet itself constitutes a public network.  The reasons for this were two-fold:

  1. The internet "is plainly a public electronic communications network provided for the public and paid for by the public through the various service providers we are all familiar with".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from