Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2007

Spamalot – Recent Cases On Direct Marketing

Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP
Contributor
Bristows LLP

Bristows LLP

We are Bristows, the world’s leading specialist law firm for clients that innovate. We are a London...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bristows LLP

Widespread use of email and increasingly advanced mobile phones has created wider opportunities for advertising. However, unsolicited email and texts are often unwelcome and put customers off, rather than encouraging them to buy.

United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Catherine Reed
Catherine Reed

Widespread use of email and increasingly advanced mobile phones has created wider opportunities for advertising.  However, unsolicited email and texts are often unwelcome and put customers off, rather than encouraging them to buy.  Most recipients simply delete unwanted mail but recently complainants have challenged the senders of spam, with some success.  The Edinburgh Sheriff’s Court ordered Transcom to pay Mr Gordon Dick £750 damages for sending him an unsolicited email and the ASA has required World Networks to pre-clear its future adverts following complaints relating to its SMS advertising. Direct marketing is regulated under the Privacy & Electronic Communications Regulations 2003 (the "Regulations").  Generally, the Regulations require advertisers not to send direct marketing by email and text except to individuals who have given their prior consent or "opted-in".  However, a company may send marketing material to an individual whose details it had obtained through selling or

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from