Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 NOVEMBER 2024

Privacy Or Publication? Walker v Goodman

Withers LLP
Withers LLP
Contributor
Withers LLP

Withers LLP

Withers is an international law firm focused on the personal, business and philanthropic interests...

View firm profile
Explore more from Withers LLP

The Walker v Goodman case underscores the challenge of balancing privacy and publicity in high-profile family law matters. Despite usual confidentiality in financial remedy proceedings, the court allowed full disclosure, reflecting the impact of media exposure on legal outcomes.

United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Privacy is power. Or perhaps 'publicity is power' would have been more appropriate for this case.

Being a fan of the beautiful game, my interest was piqued when reading the judgment of Walker v Goodman [2024] EWFC 212. Kyle Walker, the Manchester City footballer and (at the time) England vice-captain, had had two children, aged 4 and 1, with Lauryn Goodman, outside of his marriage and Ms Goodman issued family court proceedings for their financial support. This garnered some media interest.

Normally there is an expectation of privacy in financial remedy proceedings. As a minimum, those in the public eye especially consider their private affairs should be anonymised in judgments.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from