Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

The Dust Settles - The Interplay Between Arbitration Clauses And Winding-Up Petitions

Withers LLP
Withers LLP
Contributor
Withers LLP

Withers LLP

Withers is an international law firm focused on the personal, business and philanthropic interests...

View firm profile
Explore more from Withers LLP

On 23 April 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down two eagerly anticipated judgments of Re Shandong Chenming Paper Holdings Ltd [2024] HKCA 352 and Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK)...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On 23 April 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down two eagerly anticipated judgments of Re Shandong Chenming Paper Holdings Ltd [2024] HKCA 352 and Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd [2024] HKCA 299. Both appeals raise a common question of law concerning the proper approach when faced with a disputed winding-up petition where the underlying debt is subject to an arbitration clause.

In a step towards achieving much needed clarity, the twin decisions confirmed that, the principles regarding exclusive jurisdiction clauses ("EJC") laid down in Re Guy Kwok Hung Lam [2023] HKCFA 9 ("Guy Lam") also apply to arbitration clauses. In essence, unless there are countervailing factors, the Court should generally uphold arbitration clauses and decline to exercise its insolvency jurisdiction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from