Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 OCTOBER 2026

Privilege Holds The Line, For Now.

Burges Salmon LLP
Burges Salmon LLP
Contributor
Burges Salmon LLP

Burges Salmon LLP

Burges Salmon is an ambitious, sustainable and inclusive firm that ensures its clients, people and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Burges Salmon LLP

The High Court's landmark decision in Carter-Ruck v SRA has confirmed that the Solicitors Regulation Authority cannot compel law firms to disclose documents protected by legal professional privilege without client consent. This ruling reinforces the fundamental principle that privileged communications between lawyers and clients remain protected, even during regulatory investigations, though the SRA has announced its intention to appeal.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The High Court's decision in Carter-Ruck v SRAhas sparked considerable interest across the legal profession, confirming that the SRA cannot use its statutory information-gathering powers to compel law firms to disclose documents protected by a client's legal professional privilege (LPP) unless the client has waived that privilege. The ruling is a setback for the regulator, which argues that there is a real need for it to have the ability to consider privileged material in investigating, and potentially prosecuting, cases of alleged misconduct. The SRA has already announced its intention to appeal the High Court decision. 

During the High Court case, the SRA argued that it should be able to obtain documents protected by a client's LPP for two reasons. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from