Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JULY 2013

International Arbitration Clause Trumps Local Court Proceedings

A recent UK Supreme Court decision, Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC (Appellant) v AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP (Respondent) [2013] UKSC 35, may offer further protection for international arbitration.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent UK Supreme Court decision, Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC (Appellant) v AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP (Respondent) [2013] UKSC 35, may offer further protection for international arbitration. The decision supports the proposition that parties should be bound by their agreement to submit disputes to arbitration and may prevent parties pursuing claims through local courts.

The UK Supreme Court decision may offer parties a way to:

  • avoid local court proceedings where there is an arbitration agreement; and
  • resist enforcement of local court orders against assets held in the UK.

A party may be able to obtain an order for an "anti-suit injunction" from a UK court to stop the other party from continuing with local court proceedings - even if an arbitration has not started.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from