Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2025

If You Change Your Mind: A Closer Look At CPR 36.10

Gatehouse Chambers
Gatehouse Chambers
Contributor

Gatehouse Chambers

Gatehouse Chambers is a leading commercial set with expertise spanning commercial dispute...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gatehouse Chambers

In Chinda v Cardiff & Vale University Health Board [2025] EWHC 2692 (KB) the court found that there must be some significant alteration in the circumstances...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Chinda v Cardiff & Vale University Health Board  [2025] EWHC 2692 (KB) the court found that there must be some significant alteration in the circumstances of a case which would justify an offeror withdrawing or changing the terms of an offer, and the Claimant's vulnerability (when viewed in tandem with other factors) did not meet this test; the Claimant was held to his Part 36 offer, with the court declining permission to withdraw it.

The Background

An application by the Claimant dated 29 July 2025, seeking permission to withdraw his part 36 Offer made on 2 July 2025, came before Master Cook. The background to the Claim is that the Claimant alleged a delay in diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis relating to neurological injury. It is admitted that the Defendant, in breach of duty, failed to arrange MRI scanning when the Claimant attended A&E in August 2020.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from