Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2014

Excalibur v Keystone - Practical Points For Funders And Insurers

Withers LLP
Withers LLP
Contributor
Withers LLP

Withers LLP

Withers is an international law firm focused on the personal, business and philanthropic interests...

View firm profile
Explore more from Withers LLP

Judgment has been handed down in Excalibur Ventures v. Keystone et al., a Commercial Court case which is likely to change the way that third party litigation funders structure and monitor their business activities.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Judgment has been handed down in Excalibur Ventures v. Keystone et al., a Commercial Court case which is likely to change the way that third party litigation funders structure and monitor their business activities.  Withers represented Psari Holdings Ltd in the costs hearing stage of the case, which stemmed from litigation between Excalibur Ventures LLC and Texas Keystone Inc. and Gulf Keystone Petroleum Limited over interests in petroleum blocks in Kurdistan.

Psari, alongside US based professional funders, provided a total of £30 million to fund Excalibur's claim, which was unsuccessful  The judge ordering Excalibur to pay Gulf's legal costs on the indemnity basis.  Given that Excalibur was an empty shell of a company, Gulf applied to the Court for an order that Excalibur's funders pay its costs.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from