Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JUNE 2010

Evidence: In? Out? Can an Adjudicator Shake It All About?

The recent TCC case of "Jacques v Ensign" provides a useful summary of the Court's application of the concept of natural justice to adjudication proceedings.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Mark De Freitas
Mark De Freitas

Cynthia Jacques and Elsie Jacques Grombach (t/a C&E Jacques Partnership) v Ensign Contractors Limited [2009] EWHC 3383 (TCC)

INTRODUCTION

The recent TCC case of Jacques v Ensign provides a useful summary of the Court's application of the concept of natural justice to adjudication proceedings. The decision:

  • Confirms that adjudicators enjoy a wide jurisdiction in considering evidence;
  • Provides an example of the Court's discretion regarding the granting of a stay of execution;
  • Gives a salutary reminder of the costs consequences of failing to beat a settlement offer.

THE FACTS

  • In May 2006, the Employer, trading as C&E Jacques Partnership, engaged the Contractor, Ensign Contracts Limited, to renovate a number of flats in an apartment block in Liverpool for a contract sum of £339,000.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from