Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JANUARY 2024

EA Told To Think Again On Merits-Based Reviews Of CAR Decisions

Burges Salmon LLP
Burges Salmon LLP
Contributor
Burges Salmon LLP

Burges Salmon LLP

Burges Salmon is an ambitious, sustainable and inclusive firm that ensures its clients, people and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Burges Salmon LLP

In the case of R (Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd) v Environment Agency [2023], the Administrative Court held that the EA was bound to consider the need for a merits-based appeal process...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the case of R (Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd) v Environment Agency [2023], the Administrative Court held that the EA was bound to consider the need for a merits-based appeal process in respect of Compliance Assessment Report decisions

In the recent judicial review case of R (Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd) v Environment Agency [2023] the Administrative Court ruled that the Environment Agency ("EA") failed to comply with the Regulators' Code in not considering whether to provide a proper appeal mechanism for challenging Compliance Assessment Reports ("CARs"). This decision is important for anyone who holds an environmental permit, as an adverse CAR can have serious consequences.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from