Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2018

Disclosure - Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers

Court of Appeal holds judge was right to reject application for specific disclosure

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Case Alert - [2018] EWCA Civ 1470



Court of Appeal holds judge was right to reject application for specific disclosure

The claimant's application for specific disclosure was dismissed by the judge at first instance and the claimant sought permission to appeal by writing to only the judge(and not the defendant as well) after the hearing. Applying the principles laid down by Warby J in Monroe v Hopkins, the Court of Appeal held that the permission to appeal given by the judge was not validly granted. The Court of Appeal then went on to consider whether it should give permission to appeal and concluded that it should not, since the appeal raised no issue of principle.

It held that the test for specific disclosure is clear: "The application for specific disclosure will usually arise because the applicant believes that the other party has not given adequate disclosure first time round. But that is not inevitable: sometimes, there may be documents (or a

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from