Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 OCTOBER 2022

Court Guidance On When A Split Trial Is Appropriate

The case concerns claims in deceit and a related claim in conspiracy arising out of alleged fraudulent misrepresentations by the Defendants, which are said to have induced the Claimant to enter...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The recent Commercial Court decision in Jinxin Inc. v Aser Media Pte Ltd & Ors [2022] EWHC 2431 (Comm) provides helpful guidance on when a split trial (i.e. where issues in a case are decided in separate stages) will be ordered by the court. A split trial must deliver clear benefits over a single trial.

Background

The case concerns claims in deceit and a related claim in conspiracy arising out of alleged fraudulent misrepresentations by the Defendants, which are said to have induced the Claimant to enter into a SPA for the purchase of a media sports rights agency that subsequently became insolvent.

At the case management conference, several of the Defendants made an application for a split trial, wherein the issues in the case would be heard in three stages:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from