Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 MAY 2013

CASE UPDATE: RBS v Highland Partners LP & Ors

The Court of Appeal recently held that judgments obtained previously by RBS in the Commercial Court against Highland had been obtained by fraud.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

[2013] EWCA Civ 238

Successful appeal against bank which obtained judgments by fraud and dishonesty

On 12 April 2013, the Court of Appeal held that judgments obtained previously by RBS in the Commercial Court against Highland had been obtained by fraud and, due to the dishonesty exhibited by RBS, refused to allow anti-suit injunctions sought by the bank in relation to proceedings brought by Highland and Scott Law in Texas.

Factual Background

Between 2006 and 2008, RBS, like many other banks, was heavily involved in funding structures based on financial derivative products such as CDOs (Collateralised Debt Obligations). As was common practice, the Texas-based Highland group of companies launched a CDO issued by an SPV. RBS was to be the "Advisor" to the transaction and would finance the purchase of the portfolio, in this case consisting mainly of European Senior Secured Loans, to be held by the SPV issuer. The loan portfolio would provide security for the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from