Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2012

ASA Adjudications Snapshot – January 2012

This adjudication concerned an advert on Rodial’s website and an email advert promoting a product called "body sculpture".

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Susan Barty
Susan Barty
Alex Bowtell
Alex Bowtell
Stuart Helmer
Stuart Helmer
Lucy Kilshaw
Lucy Kilshaw

This article provides a selection of the most interesting ASA adjudications from January and a summary of the key issues considered in those adjudications.

To view the article in full, please see below:




Full Article

ADJUDICATIONS


COSMETICS

1. Rodial Ltd, 11 January 2012 (The ASA considered that the name of an advertised product can also act as a product claim and can itself be misleading)

2. Optical Express Ltd, 4 January 2012 (Exclusions of certain categories of people from test samples should be justifiable and made clear to consumers)

3. MyCityDeal Ltd, 25 January 2012 (An advert for a product claiming to have "temporary freeze-like effects" was found to be likely to be interpreted by consumers as having a similar effect to injected fillers)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from