Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 FEBRUARY 2015

What Are You Implying?

Case law teaches contractors a valuable lesson when dealing with ownership of copyright.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

Case law teaches contractors a valuable lesson when dealing with ownership of copyright. It is essential to deal with each party's position, typically through a written copyright licence, to avoid pitfalls further down the line. Courts are unwilling to imply terms into contracts. It is therefore advisable that all agreed terms are made explicit at the outset, because otherwise you may be left vulnerable to uncertainty and potentially harmful litigation.

Last year's case of Orvec International Limited v Linfoots Limited [2014] EWHC 1970 (IPEC) is the latest in a line of cases which highlight the dangers in this area. It illustrates why, when one party commissions another to carry out some work, it should be agreed that all present and future rights in any work created by the contractor are assigned to the commissioning party.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from