Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JUNE 2021

Selection Inventions – When Is A List Not A List?

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

It is well-established European law that the combination of two specific features each selected from different lists "of some length" may result in a novel invention when combined.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

It is well-established European law that the combination of two specific features each selected from different lists "of some length" may result in a novel invention when combined. This principle, the "two-list principle" as established in T 12/81 is outlined in detail here.

In the recently published decision T 2635/16 from the European Patent Office, the Board considers what constitutes a selection in the lists of the prior art.

In this case, Claim 1 of the patent was directed to a specific salt of a specific compound. During prosecution, the Examiner cited document D1 as novelty destroying to Claim 1. D1 related to compounds of a general formula or salts thereof and disclosed the specific compound in one of its claims, amongst a list of 121 other compounds. Separately, D1 disclosed the specific salt in a list of possible salts, the list of salts referred to the general claimed formula and not the claimed compounds. The Examiner considered that the disclosure of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from