Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JULY 2007

"Novel Circumstances" Found In Pharmaceutical Patent Case

Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP
Contributor
Bristows LLP

Bristows LLP

We are Bristows, the world’s leading specialist law firm for clients that innovate. We are a London...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bristows LLP

The recent case of Servier v Apotex generated what the Judge referred to as "novel circumstances" which resulted in a speedy consideration by the Court of Appeal of the court’s refusal to maintain an interim injunction against Apotex whilst Servier appealed the order of the High Court to revoke its patent.

United KingdomIntellectual Property
Scott Foster
Scott Foster
Claire Wilson
Claire Wilson

The recent case of Servier v Apotex generated what the Judge referred to as "novel circumstances" which resulted in a speedy consideration by the Court of Appeal of the court’s refusal to maintain an interim injunction against Apotex whilst Servier appealed the order of the High Court to revoke its patent.

Background

In August 2006, Servier commenced an action in the UK High Court against Apotex for infringement of its patent for the α crystalline form of its ACE inhibitor drug perindopril, sold under the brand name COVERSYL™. Shortly afterwards Servier obtained an interim injunction against Apotex prohibiting Apotex from placing its product on the UK market until judgment in the action was handed down. The trial took place in March 2007 and the judgment was handed down on 10 July. The Judge found the patent invalid on the grounds of lack of novelty and obviousness.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from