Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 DECEMBER 2016

Karen Millen Loses Name Game, Again.

Karen Millen has lost yet another legal battle, in this case to use her own name on clothing and household goods in China and the US

United KingdomIntellectual Property

Karen Millen has lost yet another legal battle, in this case to use her own name on clothing and household goods in China and the US. In Karen Denise Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Limited and Others1, the judge found that the use of Millen's first name in connection with clothing and accessories would breach the terms of the agreement she made when she sold her eponymous clothing company to Baugur in 2004.

Karen Millen was one of the great British success stories. With a loan of just £100 and 100 metres of cotton cloth, Millen and her partner Kevin Stanford began making shirts and selling them to friends. They opened their first store in Maidstone, Kent in 1983 and a decade later had concessions in Harrods and Fenwick. Karen Millen Limited was incorporated in 1991 and a holding company, KMHL, was set up three years later. By 2004 Karen Millen was a successful global brand with stores or concessions in nine countries and franchises in a further 15.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from