Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2009

IP Snapshot - July 2009

In invalidity proceedings a request to prove use was properly made by the registered trade mark owner in the course of making observations to OHIM, to which the applicant for invalidity responded with evidence of use.

United KingdomIntellectual Property
Isabel Davies
Isabel Davies
Tom Scourfield
Tom Scourfield

Bringing you monthly news of key developments in intellectual property law.

TRADE MARKS

Harwin International LLC -v- OHIM, Case T-450/07, 12 June 2009

In invalidity proceedings a request to prove use was properly made by the registered trade mark owner in the course of making observations to OHIM, to which the applicant for invalidity responded with evidence of use. It was wrong for the Board of Appeal to find that an express request to prove use had not been made by the trade mark owner.

For the full text of this decision, please click here.

Victor Guedes - Industria e Comercio SA -v- OHIM, CFI, Case T-151/08, 11 June 2009

The CFI upheld the Board of Appeal's decision that there was no likelihood of confusion between a device mark incorporating the word "gallecs" and earlier device marks incorporating the word "gallo", for various food products.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from