Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 FEBRUARY 2010

IP Snapshot - February 2010

The EU General Court upheld an OHIM Board of Appeal decision that Article 8(5) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation (40/94/EEC, now replaced by 2009/207/EC) did not apply because the visual and conceptual differences between the "G Stor" figurative mark applied for, and the earlier marks relied on, the "G-Star" figurative mark and the word marks G-STAR and G-STAR RAW DENIM, prevented any assumption of a possible link between them.

United KingdomIntellectual Property
Isabel Davies
Isabel Davies
Tom Scourfield
Tom Scourfield

Bringing you monthly news of key developments in intellectual property law.

TRADE MARKS

G-Star Raw Denim kft v OHIM, General Court, 21 January 2010

The EU General Court upheld an OHIM Board of Appeal decision that Article 8(5) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation (40/94/EEC, now replaced by 2009/207/EC) did not apply because the visual and conceptual differences between the "G Stor" figurative mark applied for, and the earlier marks relied on, the "G-Star" figurative mark and the word marks G-STAR and G-STAR RAW DENIM, prevented any assumption of a possible link between them.

For the full text of the decision, click here (www.law-now.com/gstar).

Audi AG v OHIM, ECJ, 21 January 2010

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from