Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 NOVEMBER 2014

Interflora v M&S – The Saga Continues

Wedlake Bell LLP
Wedlake Bell LLP
Contributor
Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell LLP

Wedlake Bell provides clients with a full package of legal services delivering commercial and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wedlake Bell LLP

The 6 year legal battle between Interflora and M&S has taken a new twist following the Court of Appeal's latest appeal ruling in the case Interflora Inc & Anor v Marks and Spencer plc.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

The 6 year legal battle between flower delivery giant Interflora and M&S has taken a new twist following the Court of Appeal's latest appeal ruling in the case (Interflora Inc & Anor v Marks and Spencer plc [2014] EWCA Civ 1403). The appeal was brought by M&S in an effort to overturn the decision reached at trial last May by Mr Justice Arnold who held that M&S had infringed Interflora's trade marks.

Background

Interflora originally brought its infringement claim against M&S in the High Court back in 2008.  It had objected to M&S paying Google for the right to use the keyword "interflora" as a search term to help generate adverts promoting its own (i.e. M&S's) competing flower delivery service.   As a result of M&S's actions, consumers using "interflora" as a Google search term were led to a search results page in which M&S's service was prominently advertised.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from