Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MAY 2016

GAP's Unused Trade Mark Advantageous In Opposing Third Party Application

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

The famous GAP brand has succeeded in opposing a third party's registration of "The GapTravel Guide", in the High Court of England and Wales.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

The famous GAP brand has succeeded in opposing a third party's registration of "The GapTravel Guide", in the High Court of England and Wales.

The judgment, Gap (ITM) Inc v British American Group Limited [2016] EWHC 599 (Ch) (21 March 2016), of deputy judge John Baldwin QC, is available here.

Background

In January 2014, British American Group Ltd sought to register "The GapTravel Guide" as a UK trade mark in respect of the services of 'magazine publishing' in class 41. The application was opposed by Gap (ITM) Inc, which owns trade marks used in relation to GAP branded clothing stores, on numerous grounds. The UK IPO Hearing Officer dismissed Gap's opposition, but it appealed the Hearing Officer's decision to the High Court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from