Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 DECEMBER 2024

"Copycat" Brands – How Close Is Too Close?

Shepherd and Wedderburn
Shepherd and Wedderburn
Contributor
Shepherd and Wedderburn

Shepherd and Wedderburn

We are an independent law firm, headquartered in Scotland, delivering high-quality legal advice and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Shepherd and Wedderburn

This article discusses the legal issues surrounding "copycat" brands, which imitate the look or branding of established products without infringing intellectual property rights. It explores the concepts of trademark infringement and passing off, highlighting notable legal cases and offering advice for businesses to protect their trademarks.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

The issue of copycat brands has been around almost since people started trading and marking goods.

One of the earliest cases was reported in 1617, and in it one of the judges referred to a case involving a "a clothier, [who] had gained great reputation for his making of his cloth [and] he used to set his mark to his cloth, whereby it should be known to be his cloth and another clothier perceiving it, used the same mark to his ill-made cloth on purpose to deceive him, and it was resolved that the action did well lie."

The world of branding has moved on, but at the heart of a passing off case is deceit. That gives us the famous legal test from Perry v Truefitt: "A man is not to sell his own goods under the pretence that they are the goods of another man".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from