Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 NOVEMBER 2025

Commentary On The Getty v. Stability Judgment

GTG Legal
GTG Legal
Contributor
GTG Legal

GTG Legal

Since its founding in 1997, GTG has been at the forefront of Malta’s legal profession, blending...

View firm profile
Explore more from GTG Legal

New technologies are increasingly colliding with established legal principles, forcing courts and legislators to reconcile principles drafted for a different era with today's technological reality.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

Getty v. Stability

New technologies are increasingly colliding with established legal principles, forcing courts and legislators to reconcile principles drafted for a different era with today's technological reality.

Perhaps nowhere is this tension clearer than in the intersection between Artificial Intelligence ("AI") and Intellectual Property ("IP"), where traditional concepts of ownership and originality are being redefined. The legal frameworks governing AI and IP remain nascent, and precedent is still catching up.

The case of Getty Images v. Stability AI marks a foundational step in that process, a landmark case attempting to draw the line between training and copying, and to define how far traditional IP law can stretch to accommodate a technology that "learns" ... but does not necessarily "remember".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from