Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 FEBRUARY 2023

Case Analysis: Vodafone Group PLC And Ors v IPCom GmbH

Although rare, a problem arises when an English court finds a EP(UK) valid and infringed only for the EPO to find it invalid, or the claim set amended taking the infringement outside the scope of protection.

United KingdomIntellectual Property

Implication of EPO decision on prior English court decision

Summary

Although rare, a problem arises when an English court finds a EP(UK) valid and infringed only for the EPO to find it invalid, or the claim set amended taking the infringement outside the scope of protection. This was the situation faced by Vodafone (Vodafone Group PLC and ors v IPCom GmbH & Co KG  [2023] EWCA Civ 113).

The problem is particularly acute where the EPO's decision occurs some considerable time later, and the English court may well have reached a decision on the enquiry as to damages. Costs at the liability stage will have been paid, often very large sums, and an order awarding millions of pounds in damages handed down. As a decision of the EPO has retrospective effect, the revocation of the patent ab initio  leads to an apparent injustice having been perpetrated.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from