Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JULY 2022

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Case Analysis: Nestlé v Cadbury

The fight over use of the colour purple is, perhaps, one of the more hotly contested colour battles. It is not, however, restricted only to a couple of businesses in a single field...

United KingdomIntellectual Property

Cadbury finally hits a purple patch

Summary

The fight over use of the colour purple is, perhaps, one of the more hotly contested colour battles. It is not, however, restricted only to a couple of businesses in a single field (Glaxo and Sandoz fought over it in relation to inhalers). Nevertheless, in the minds of trade mark practitioners, it is more usually associated with Cadbury trying to obtain registrations, with Nestlé opposing (no doubt in retaliation for Cadbury doing the same (and successfully) in relation to the 3D mark for KIT KAT chocolate bars).

Seeking to dominate a specific single colour has been a contentious approach and few have successfully achieved this. This, however, is primarily because of the scope of the description in the trade mark application, not because such marks are unacceptable in terms of the case law: Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau  Case C-104/01 deciding it was possible subject to certain criteria being fulfilled.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from